Financial result
Profitable outcome
Recorded execution did not match the stated Play.
We’re building a better way to review your trading
See how you actually traded, not just where the P/L landed.
We’re building TradeWiz to connect your broker activity, Plays, Trade Plans, and reviews, so you can see where your execution matched the process you meant to follow.
Your process. Your evidence. No signals, predictions, or trade execution.
Living evidence system
Intent and execution stay connected
Historical review · no market signal
Evidence connected
- 01
Intent preserved
Play + Trade Plan
Trader supplied
- 02
Activity retained
Orders + fills
Broker recorded
- 03
Trade reconstructed
Position lifecycle
Deterministic
- 04
Review explained
Matched · differed · unknown
Evidence aware
Illustrative product view · example data
Visuals explain evidence; they do not generate a signal.
Planned vs actual
TRADE 014Intent
Execution
Entry began later than the saved window in this example.
Behavioral pattern
N = 28Holding time and outcome shown as association, with the sample visible.
Alignment evidence
4 AREASAreaReviewEvidenceEntryMatchedMeasuredRiskReviewPartialExitDifferedMeasured
Rule match and evidence strength remain separate.
The part your broker missed
Your broker captured every fill. It still can’t tell you why the trade happened.
That missing “why” is where we’re focused. We want the plan, the execution, and the outcome to stay connected long after the trade closes.
What your broker remembers
- Orders
- Fills
- Quantities
- Prices
- Timestamps
What it can’t tell you on its own
- Which activity belonged to the same trade
- Which Play the trader intended to follow
- Whether scaling or adjustments were planned
- Where execution departed from the rules
- Which explanations existed before the outcome
- What cannot be determined from the evidence
One distinction changes the review
A win can wander off-plan. A loss can follow it closely.
Financial result
Losing outcome
Recorded execution closely matched the stated Play.
That’s why we keep outcome and process separate. P/L tells you where the trade ended; it doesn’t tell you how you got there.
These examples are descriptive only and do not predict future results.
How we’re connecting the dots
From scattered activity to a review that keeps the whole story together.
01
Reconstruct
We bring related broker activity back together as one trade.
02
Connect
You connect the trade with the Play and intent behind it.
03
Compare
We place the plan beside the execution without mixing in the outcome.
04
Explain
We show what the evidence supports and where it stops.
Reconstructed trades
Fills are fragments. We bring them back together.
A single trade can stretch across orders, partial fills, scale-ins, exits, and instrument-specific events. We rebuild those pieces into a position lifecycle you can actually review.
- Scale-ins
- Scale-outs
- Partial fills
- Reversals
- Option legs
- Rolls and adjustments
- Expirations and assignments
- Positions spanning multiple orders
Reusable Plays
Write the Play before hindsight gets a vote.
Your Play captures the process you want to repeat. Your Trade Plan preserves the exact version and context you brought to one opportunity before the result can change the memory.
- Context
- Entry conditions
- Management rules
- Invalidation conditions
- Exit conditions
- Allocation or risk rules
- Version history
You define the Play. We help you keep it connected to the evidence.
Honesty lives in the gaps too
If the evidence is fuzzy, we’ll say so.
Recorded
We can point directly to broker activity or another retained record.
Supplied
You added it through a Play, note, Trade Plan, or review.
Inferred
The evidence supports an interpretation, but not a direct fact.
Unknown
We don’t have enough information to make a reliable call.
Plan, meet execution
Put what you meant to do beside what the evidence says happened.
Patterns worth thinking about
More clarity to explore, without another score to chase.
01
Intent versus execution
02
Rule alignment
03
Execution alignment
04
Scaling behavior
05
Position and account allocation
06
Repeated deviations
07
Play usage
08
Historical behavioral patterns
09
Evidence confidence
10
Missing or conflicting context
Who TradeWiz is for
For traders who care as much about the process as the outcome.
For active traders who
- Already review their trading
- Use repeatable setups, Plays, or personal rules
- Find broker history incomplete
- Want approachable, evidence-based analysis
- Accept uncertainty when evidence is missing
Not for people seeking
- Signals
- Predictions
- Copy trading
- Automated execution
- Personalized financial advice
- Guaranteed performance improvement
Come build with us
We’re building TradeWiz in the open, and we’re just getting started.
Taking shape now
The foundation is alive
The core is taking shape: broker activity reconstruction, Plays, Trade Plans, journaling, trade linking, evidence checks, and planned-versus-actual review.
In our hands
We’re testing the loop
We’re tightening the full Play-to-Review loop so it feels useful, clear, and trustworthy from the first imported trade onward.
On the way
More evidence, carefully
As the foundation proves itself, we’ll deepen the historical patterns, context, and evidence tools without turning them into predictions.
The Performance Loop
Why we’re building TradeWiz
We think the record should remember the decision, not just the result.
We’ve seen how quickly a trade’s outcome can rewrite the memory of the decision. A clean win can hide messy execution. A difficult loss can overshadow a process that was followed with care.
We believe traders deserve a clearer record: one that keeps intent, execution, outcome, and evidence separate without making the experience feel clinical or overwhelming.
We’re not building another screen that tells you what to trade. We’re building a place where you can look back, understand your own process, and keep refining it on your terms.
We’re excited to build it with you.
• The TradeWiz team
FAQ
A few things you might be wondering.
No, and that’s intentional. We’re building TradeWiz to help you understand your own process, not tell you what to trade, when to enter, or when to exit.
No. You bring the rules that matter to you. We help you preserve them and compare them with what your execution evidence shows. We don’t write the rules or make market decisions for you.
No. We can make historical patterns easier to see, along with the sample and limitations behind them. We won’t dress that history up as a prediction about what happens next.
We start with the activity your broker recorded, organize related fills and events, and rebuild the position lifecycle into a trade you can actually review. If the evidence is incomplete or conflicting, we show the limitation instead of forcing a neat answer.
You tell us. Your Play captures the repeatable process, and your Trade Plan preserves the version and context you brought to a specific opportunity. That gives us something real to compare with the execution later.
We say so. Every review separates what was recorded, what you supplied, what can reasonably be inferred, and what is still unknown. Sometimes the most honest answer is simply: we can’t determine that yet.
A Play is your reusable process for a repeatable opportunity. It can hold the context you look for, entry and exit rules, risk boundaries, management decisions, invalidation conditions, and the history of how that Play evolved.
We’re designing TradeWiz for stocks, ETFs, options, and futures, with read-only broker connections at the foundation. We’ll share the confirmed broker list and rollout details in our build updates as they’re ready.
Yes, but we’re taking it further than notes. We’re connecting journal context with reconstructed trades, Plays, Trade Plans, and planned-versus-actual review so the story doesn’t stop at P/L.
We’re actively building TradeWiz now. If you want to see what we’re working on, what we’re learning, and when access opens, join our newsletter for build updates.
We’re building around read-only connections, clear data ownership, and strict workspace separation. Raw broker evidence stays distinct from the records and reconstructed trades we use for review, so the path back to the source remains visible.
No. A clearer record can help you ask better questions, but it can’t guarantee a better outcome. Our job is to make your intent, execution, results, and evidence easier to understand, not promise performance.